lunian
Anonymous asked:
Omfg like ‘50 shades of grey’??
Well, I saw many old concept arts and I can say thats not so big plot twist at all.
lunian
Anonymous asked:
MMMMMMMMMM I SEE SOME NICE CONCEPT HERE I LOVE IT THANK YOU AKJSHDG;ALDHGDSFG
lunian
fullpandacollectionme asked:
Lmaooo yeah, I had thoughts about it tbh. It would 1000% work like that if I wasnt lazy to draw it
gale-of-the-nomads
Anonymous asked:
1. Thoughts about Chloe.
Sweet: I think Chloé is a good bully character. She is a prime example who is mean, but also has a reason on why she is like that. (have you seen her b**** of a mother). So the concept of Redeeming her would be kind of cool. Plus Without her, Scarlet Lady au wouldn’t exist, and I wouldn’t have been dragged back into the fandom.
Salty: The word of the day is Execution. They failed making Chloé redeemable. They had the ball and tripped, and ended up scoring on their own goal. Plus, there are times when she goes way too mean, it is kind of twisted.
2. Opinion on the Miraculous PV / 2D version.
Sweet: The animation is nice, and the battle sequences look fluid. I would like to see a version of the show done with this style of animation. (It also allows for more freedom and allows for them to do more with expressions and a scene) Hawkmoth/Gabriel looked intimidating and cool.
Salty: Concept Marinette and Felix are super cliché. Felix is just a grouchy anime guy and he seems like a stuck up prick. Concept Marinette seems annoying and kind of out there. It is a sweet sour deal. Plus Chat noir just seems… creepy. Idk it just can’t be put right.
3. Handling and plot of characters by the writers of the series
Sweet: The lore, oh sweet Kwami the lore of the world got me curious. I want to know more about Kwami and how the concepts of the miraculous, how Hawkmoth would revive his wife. I am super invested in the mystical. As for the characters, When handled right, the show grounds the characters, both main and side characters with a level of realism that makes them relatable and understandable on motivations.
Salty: The problem is the show doesn’t handle the characters right 90% of the time. Due to the episodic nature of the show, they need to make episodes have problems in order to make threats seem larger then they are. What that means is, if they need a character to act mean to a certain character, they act mean or heartless even if a few episodes before hand explains how little sense it makes. Most of the time Chloé is the one doing the mean thing so this isn’t a problem, but in the episode reverser, it was Nathanael being uncharacteristically mean. Which makes no sense, as in evillustrator he is only mean when he is hurt by someone blatantly. It was dumb. Not to mentions the problems with the adults in the show, but I wrote about them earlier.
My main problem with the Plot of characters is Adrien. My sunshine son, it isn’t your fault, its the writers that are giving you problems. Adrien in season 2 comes off as kind of a selfish d***. They try to make it seem like he is naive or fault is that he is to hopeful, but it comes off as kind of patronizing and spoiled. While not as extreme as everyone makes it out to be, Adrien never learns lessons, and is slowly becoming more of an a**hole.
godasenpai
icpe
When your mutual adds a dumb ass comment to a post and you gotta reblog from the source
gale-of-the-nomads
Yea, I found the animation error, THE ENTIRE EPISODE.
krunkidile
wintermoth
shippingfangirl14
ruinedchildhood
